Why I Blog Response

Andrew Sullivan’s article, “Why I blog”, was an insightful explanation of blogging. It was fascinating to read a famous blogger’s opinion and perspective. I found it extremely interesting that he did not think blogging would replace traditional writing. In fact, he argued that the blogosphere created a new generation of readers who are interested in nonfiction. He feels that the nature of blogging makes traditional writing invaluable. In the article, Sullivan gives a multitude of reasons why he blogs. One reason he blogs is because blogging is unstructured by nature. He states, “[Blogging] allows for no retroactive editing … and removes from the act of writing any considered or lengthy review”. Blogging is, therefore, a random expression of instant thought. It is a free-write that is informal and riddled with minor errors that are scarce in the realm of traditional journalism. Another fascinating aspect of blogging is the balance between individual voice and the collective mind. Blogs are personal and filled with emotion. Sullivan describes it as “writing out loud”. Blogs expose an author more than any other literary outlet. Because blogging demands a more spontaneous and passionate response than any other form of writing, the reader is able to look directly at the author. The author cannot hide behind layers of editing and revising. On the other hand, anyone can be a critic. Blogs are mercilessly scrutinized by their readers. This scrutiny allows readers to collectively dictate the direction of the blogosphere. The collective mind of bloggers and readers is constantly evolving. Blogging is a new form of writing, that rather than replacing traditional writing, has expanded the public’s definition of writing and civic literacy.